Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penciptaan Seni, applies editorial screening and peer review to evaluate the quality, originality, relevance, and methodological rigor of submitted manuscripts.
1. Initial Editorial Screening
Upon submission, the editorial team checks whether the manuscript:
-
Falls within the journal's aims and scope.
-
Meets the basic requirements of the Author Guidelines.
-
Presents an appropriate level of scholarly quality.
-
Contains the necessary declarations and supporting information.
-
Raises apparent concerns regarding originality, research ethics, or publication integrity.
The editor may reject a manuscript at this stage if it is unsuitable for the journal or does not meet the minimum requirements for further consideration.
2. Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass initial screening may be sent to independent reviewers with relevant subject expertise.
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penciptaan Seni uses a double blind peer review or double-anonymous peer review. The journal should state the actual review model consistently across its website and submission system.
Reviewers assess the manuscript's originality, theoretical foundation, research design, analytical procedures, interpretation of results, contribution to the field, clarity, and references.
3. Reviewers' Recommendations
Reviewers may recommend:
-
Acceptance.
-
Minor revision.
-
Major revision.
-
Rejection.
These recommendations are advisory. The editor makes the final decision after considering the reviewers' assessments, the manuscript's quality, and the journal's editorial standards.
4. Revision Process
Authors receiving a revision decision must submit a revised manuscript and a point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments within the deadline specified by the editorial office.
Authors should explain how each comment has been addressed. If they disagree with a recommendation, they should provide a reasoned academic explanation.
A revised manuscript may be returned to the original reviewers or evaluated by the editor, depending on the nature of the revisions.
5. Editorial Decision
The editor may accept, request further revision, or reject the manuscript. Acceptance is granted only after the editor determines that the manuscript meets the journal's requirements.
6. Confidentiality and Impartiality
Editors and reviewers must treat manuscripts as confidential documents. Unpublished information must not be used for personal advantage.
Reviewers should disclose relevant conflicts of interest and decline assignments where impartiality cannot reasonably be maintained.
7. Review Integrity
Attempts to manipulate peer review, provide false reviewer identities, interfere with editorial decisions, or improperly influence reviewers may result in rejection and further action under the journal's publication ethics policies.
8. Review Duration
Review duration may vary according to reviewer availability, subject complexity, revision requirements, and editorial workload. The journal does not guarantee a fixed review period.
All editorial decisions are intended to be based on scholarly merit, ethical standards, and the journal's scope.
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penciptaan Seni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License